Episode 5
· 02:05:16
I'm okay.
Oh,
so good.
This is why Michael
gets the big bucks.
Because he can actually sing.
I don't know about that.
I'll try.
Ready?
You're like, what's that
guy?
He's tone deaf.
Yeah, exactly.
I'm like,
I'm not horrible,
but you wouldn't want to listen.
You just gotta train a little bit
more.
Anyways, welcome to
the Prohemed Decay
podcast.
We are your
hosts,
Michael, Daniel,
and Steven.
And this is
a
beautiful day.
And also a perfume decay.
Well, I said
this is the perfume decay podcast.
Oh, well, I missed that part.
Yeah, it's okay.
You weren't listening to me.
Whatever, dude.
It is 3
o 'clock.
I mean, 2 .55...
PM.
PM.
That is why
it looks light
outside the window
and not just dark.
Okay.
They didn't want to be flashed.
That looks like
a bright flashlight.
That was.
Thank you.
Otherwise known as the sun.
That's true.
You know what?
You're right.
Thank you for joining
us on this
very interesting,
different energy than
we normally have.
Is it?
Yeah.
Well, because we've been doing
late nights or just
weird hours.
Well, last episode we didn't.
Did we?
Yeah, we did.
Well, it started out kind
of okay.
Yeah.
We started out...
Well, we started out late.
We went for four hours last
time.
That was the first episode.
But here on Perfume
Decay,
we venture into the
spiritual through the Bible,
perfuming our
experience with the sweet aroma
of God's Word,
and then partake of all
else known to us in the
decay of this world in the
physical, mental,
and emotional.
Amen, Amen.
You got it.
And today's
topics I'm very
excited for.
They're going to be deep.
This might be another four -hour
episode.
Well, actually, we got
a time clock, actually.
We have a time clock, which
has proven to be
successful in the past.
Well, it's taken
us an hour to get to this point
where we're actually recording.
Yeah.
I mean, part of that was you eating.
Us talking.
Us talking.
Setting up.
Setting up.
Even though we've got this
wonderful setup now,
it still takes us a long time.
I think we just
got to lock in when we show up.
We just got to go straight to the...
Yeah.
But, I mean,
setup was actually really quick this time.
Yeah.
Like the actual setup, so...
Yeah.
The longest part
was...
Talking.
I mean, the transcript.
That was it.
That's true.
Yeah.
But,
yeah.
I mean, we're getting a little more
refined,
little by little.
We have these new
camera
stands for Jimmy
and Stephanie,
which is
super awesome.
Eventually, we're going to have
arms
for the mics.
We're reinventing ourselves.
But I think we be could should...
This great.
You're not going to hear this anymore.
Yeah.
Which is so annoying.
So...
And then...
So, I noticed I was
listening to...
Watching the podcast last time.
Yeah.
And I noticed that when you were talking,
and then when I was talking,
because it was probably mimicking you.
That annoying.
You would make a point,
and every single time you
made a point in
your long monologue, you would
just...
Really?
Not that hard.
I'm being obvious, but you'd be like,
it's a really good
point.
Yeah.
And you
could tear it in the mic.
That's so funny.
I don't even
realize I'm doing
that.
Yeah.
That's great.
Well, you listened to the last one, right?
Yeah, I listened to it.
You didn't notice that?
No.
Wow.
Yeah.
Weird.
Yeah.
But we should
probably...
Roll into it.
Roll into it.
Yeah.
So, we want to get our
boy Hugh on.
I think he hasn't heard
from you in a while.
I think you should.
For me?
Yeah.
Okay, I'll give him a call.
Yeah,
See you.
I mean, I did give
Stephen his
phone number.
Yeah.
Finally.
Finally.
Yeah.
Okay, I'll give him a call.
Here he is.
You guys hear that?
Yeah.
Hopefully he picks up.
He's pretty reliable.
Humanity here.
And last episode was a spiritual
speed run where Michael and
Daniel tried to do a quick
start...
immediately forgot how time works,
and turned a simple intro into a
roast marathon about
emotions, girlfriends,
and why nobody has Chuck's
number when it matters.
We ricocheted from
never listen to your
heart, into forgiveness.
Social contract theory getting
suplexed by grace,
and that wildflower analogy
where manipulation is
basically plucking someone's
beauty for your own bouquet
and calling it helping.
Then we dove into
Eden, two trees,
one forbidden snack, and
Adam and Eve inventing shame
so fast you'd think
fig leaves were a
subscription service.
Today, Michael and
Daniel finally answer
last episode's cliffhanger.
If it's wrong for a random
person to forgive on someone
else's behalf, then who
actually has the authority
to forgive it all?
And what does that imply about
morality,
justice, and whether God
exists?
Keep your brain switched on
and your loopholes switched
off.
Because they're about to unpack
it without hiding behind word
games.
Michael and Daniel, take it away.
He really wants us to talk
about forgiveness.
He really wants to hammer that point.
I feel like - By you.
Yeah, that was the same
exact thing he said last
time.
I think for the last three times.
Yeah.
We gotta have a sit down with you.
Yeah, we have to -
Rough him up a little.
Take him out back.
Have a heart to heart.
Yeah.
In the roughest way possible.
In the roughest way possible.
Like open heart.
And maybe he can
exercise that forgiveness that he's so
focused on.
Right.
Which - Maybe I can.
Maybe you can.
Maybe.
Maybe we need to exercise that
forgiveness.
Maybe he's running tall or something.
Oh.
Is he trying to annoy
us to the point of needing to forgive
him?
Maybe.
Sounds a little manipulative.
It does, yeah.
Almost sounds like he's
picking
our flowers
for his own bouquet.
Yeah.
But I do
like the suplex
- what was it?
Suplexing
social contract
theory with Grace.
That's so funny.
And then plucking
someone's beauty for
your own bouquet.
Yeah.
That was fire.
Yeah, that was tight.
Reminder,
we don't hear these
before the
podcast at all.
We just -
We go for it.
Maybe we should.
No.
No, it's great.
Well, at least so we can get rid of the
forgettist thing.
Yeah, I think what it's doing
is just like
picking up on the keyword in
the transcript that says cliffhanger.
And just like, oh, that's that's what it
is.
Yeah, that's right.
So we'll have to fix that
prompting a little bit.
That's okay.
But you know, GPT's lazy.
What is -
Today's topic?
What is our open
about?
I think it's interesting that
we're deciding this right now.
How about the eggnog?
The eggnog.
The eggnog is bomb.
Yeah.
You want to tell us what's in it?
Alcohol.
You told me this was non
-alcoholic.
If it was non
-alcoholic, I don't think Stephen would be
drinking it.
I got to drive this.
I got to drive afterwards.
You had one
- what was the
voodoo - Hey,
what were you - The thing voodoo that you
had.
Do we see a voodoo can?
Do you have a - Anywhere?
Yeah, because he threw it at the
door.
There has to be a trash can
over there.
I crushed it and I threw it
into the corner.
He's like, what are you doing?
I'm like, well, it was a good
shot.
There should have been a trash can over
there.
I threw, thus there
is trash.
Well, to be fair, there usually
is something sort of like
a trash can over there.
And no.
The blue thing?
There has not been a trash can.
That's not a trash can?
No.
You tell me I've been throwing
stuff into that blue
thing.
Dang it, it's a trash can.
And it's not a trash can.
It feels like a trash can.
Am I just insulting you now?
I don't even know what that bucket
- Oh, that used
to be for the turtle.
Oh, yeah, that makes sense.
It looks like trash.
But that's funny.
I'm glad I'm not insulting something
very personal too.
You're not.
That was good.
But I feel like I should be
insulting.
Just for the sake of being
insulted.
That turtle should definitely be
insulted.
Insulted.
The tortle insulted.
Anyways,
Merry Christmas to everybody.
That was this week.
Cheers.
That was.
Cheers.
Oh, here we go.
Pass the nod around.
Cheers.
Yeah, we - I was -
oh, okay, here we go.
How was Christmas?
Yeah, that was Christmas.
What is - what is
- what was our experience?
What was our -
did we do anything?
I did something.
Yeah?
I woke up.
That's true.
You waxed your car for three days
straight.
I did wax my car for three days
straight.
I actually buffed the paint off
in the corner of
the trunk - Nice.
Nice.
On accident.
On accident.
So it's So it's like - down to the primer.
Did you cry?
No, I've got
this just like acceptance
when it comes to my car because
it's so nice.
I knew that nice
things don't stay nice all the time.
People make mistakes.
They scratch cars.
They run into cars.
They destroy
nice things.
And so I just like accepted that fact
when I bought it.
Nice.
That it's probably not going to stay
nice.
So I was a little bit
disappointed.
And
now
I'm curious of how
it
would be fixable.
There's,
I've looked up a few methods
and my best
options are
a DIY
spray kind
of thing.
But it's probably not going to be perfect
match, especially because
it's right on the edge of
the trunk and there's no
hard lines to
sort of hide
the
difference
in the paint color, which is
inevitable.
So I'll probably
just take it to a professional
place
to touch up
everywhere because there's
quite a few scratches.
So there you go.
So you've had experience
with the disappointment then?
Yeah.
I mean, it's
not
worth getting
heated.
Yeah, I worked up about something
like that.
Or really anything.
The only
thing that I should
really get heated about is
if
someone's messing with
another person
or
something
happens to another
person,
that's
where it's actually like,
okay, yeah, you can definitely
have
some feelings about that.
But I mean, not to say having
feelings about inanimate
objects is wrong.
I just say, I think
I'm very stoic
and know it.
But Christmas,
I was going over to pick up Steven
and he texted
me about one of his gifts.
You want to tell him about it?
Or was there more?
No, not much.
So my parents
got
me
a
TV wall mount and
I use this TV
as
my monitor
for my gaming desktop.
Nice.
Except the
frame right?
nice The things.
No,
no, no.
That's not really the consensus is that
the frame rate is never enough for a
TV.
Oh, yeah.
Well, this is
true, but
it can't
really tell.
So
isn't
that true?
Can you tell?
Yeah, you can.
Around 30 frames,
it starts to really
dip off and you can
even I can
tell.
Every once in a while, if you're shifting
around and
you're like third person in a
camera,
it'll be kind of a
ghosting effect.
Oh,
like it's lagging behind.
Yeah.
Okay, yeah.
So
the
hard thing
about this gift
is that
I
have the TV because of my
vision right up
next to me.
And so I only have room in front
of the TV for my keyboard,
mouse and other
stuff, phone charger,
cup holder.
And so my desktop, my
tower is right behind
my TV.
And
the TV
now
comes
out.
Yeah.
Like it comes out towards you.
And this desktop computer
is a big boy.
Yeah.
It's thick.
It's the
Lenovo
Evo.
Oh, it's pretty.
Yeah.
It's like a see -through case
with like,
what's the thing
on the bottom and the fans
and everything?
Don't you have like a special like
graphics card or
something?
No, not necessarily a special
graphics card.
It's the
Radeon
XTX.
For all you computer nerds out there,
I have no idea what these things are.
All I know is it's powerful.
It's a
1440p
graphics
card, basically.
Yeah.
Native, 1440p.
Thanks.
Love that.
What does that mean when you're playing
video
games?
So,
yeah.
Well, there's
720, which
most people can
handle, but
it's not pretty
at all.
There's still some grain to
it,
but it's it's manageable
through the average
person.
1080p is where
it's kind of a sweet
spot for
like
high range games like Call of Duty.
Let's take, for instance,
FPS driven
games which need
fast reflexes.
Fast timing is more frame rate
than quality.
1440p is kind
of the mix between
frame rate and
quality,
which I kind of wanted
because
just because
I'm like
visually impaired,
I can still see color really well.
Like I love
watching colors
on the screen.
having vivid colors,
I turn my
displays
always on vivid
just
to enhance
kind of like
picture qualities,
video, video qualities.
So then like
4k is like
not
is way more quality
than frame rate.
And
that's
where you get like the 4k
TVs and everyone's like
when the OLED
displays and
all this fancy
stuff.
So goes all the way
up to like 6k right?
There's a higher Yeah,
I think
there's gonna be like,
get
at
the last
tech convention, there's
like a Mar that was like
15k.
Yeah, there's no reason they
can't go higher.
But the
quality
that you notice,
depending on the person, like
it's like
diminishing
returns.
Here's anyways, here's Christmas
gift.
Yeah, here's what I'm realizing,
just based off of
this, what we got the
specs guy.
We got the
guy that knows how to
use tech.
And then we caught the guy that doesn't
know how to use tech at all.
Doesn't But know.
most
definitely for me.
Probably for him.
I don't know.
How much do you play?
Um,
well, so I do farming
simulator and I can
basically have
workers work on
the fields.
And then I can do like,
Google Search again, I used to
do homework.
I
just
say alongside it, but
like if it
was a super big field, and
I was like doing a whatever
map, like unrealistic,
everything, I could have the
worker do it for like,
several hours,
this one field and yeah,
but that's not really just do homework
the rest of the time.
Just aren't really gaming gaming as far
involved.
No,
um, more idling.
Yeah.
Like that's just a slow paced
games.
I've gotten more
into
I
recently bought Halo.
Which one?
The Master Chief series.
Okay.
So all of them.
Which
I'm
going through them in timeline order.
So I
mean, you're not getting
with the first
two
at least.
I think it is first two or
three.
At least I read on
comments.
You're not getting the best graphics
of today's standards.
Yeah.
He might not beer
for everybody who says
yeah.
So,
but needless to say,
your,
your
wall mounts doesn't
do any favors.
Yeah.
Also, I want to put your little
float your word.
Put the desktop.
Yeah, the dilemma is
like 20
inches by
like 12 inches
wide.
Sheesh.
Yeah.
Um,
but thinking
either like doing a shelf
on top of,
um,
the
above
the mark, the TV,
it's basically because
it's a fishbowl
tower,
basically.
Yeah.
Case.
Um, and I have some RGB
fans to it.
Um, RGB RAM,
not a whole lot of like
out
of,
um,
I want to say
seven
fans, only like
three or,
um,
RGB.
So I don't have very much
RGB.
I didn't really want a whole
lot of RGB.
I want more black,
a black style, but
some color to it.
Yeah.
So, um, and then
the other dilemma I have
is, um,
getting a new desk.
Nice.
So, yeah,
more research.
Um,
how about you, Michael?
How was your Christmas?
No, somebody that's giving them
my desk.
Uh, so my Christmas was
spent with my
roommates.
And now your family?
No, my family was
in Flagstaff.
Oh.
Uh,
which they do every year.
Why didn't you go?
Uh, because I worked
Monday and Tuesday,
and I don't trust my car to
go up
to Flagstaff right now.
Fair.
Um, so I spent,
so actually, first
off, on Tuesday, I
spent,
um, the beginning of my day
hitting a coyote,
and then following three
hours being,
uh, flabbergasted,
uh, in shock
from one
probably killing
a
animal.
A tasty coyote thing you could
have.
Right.
Barbecue.
Being in shock
and just,
that was awful.
And then, uh, yeah, you
texted me and
Danny, and we're just like, sort
of, I
was
like, what
the heck?
I'm like, I felt so bad for
that coyote.
Yeah.
And I thought I was dragging it along.
No, No, like in
the front of my car.
cuz I heard a dragon sound I'm like, oh my
gosh that could be the coyote
So I was hard.
It was just the my
bumper.
My numbers all imagine
though.
Yeah I
think
I think that would have been too
traumatizing for me.
I would have just been like
hey, I'm I
can't
Can't it's not happening
But yeah,
so that was interesting.
Yeah, there's a huge gash
on the side of my
bumper now Oh,
yeah, we got a picture.
Oh, yeah, I'll pull it.
Oh, yeah but
Yeah, then I my
dad bought
a
Lego
Mustang huge one
with like
motor and all that
different stuff
For me and my roommate to
build he bought
like the
Exploding kittens
Yeah,
it's
awful an exploding
kittens board
game Which cameras and
then he also got us
Robo tech
the complete
blu -ray
Collection
for us
to
Bond over
do together.
We spent a few
hours.
We just watched the
first disc, but
And there you go.
That's didn't even finish the
Yeah, poor thing.
Yeah
but um, yeah
That was that was my
Christmas and
then my mind
our
family friend
came over as
well and hung out with
us Yeah, it
sounds fun
Then yesterday
I did
Absolutely nothing I
just watched
movies
try to figure out what
to do.
Yeah
Made some videos for
um
Years,
no.
Yeah for the New Year's I
don't know.
Yeah
Trying to get a crowd.
Yeah, I see trying
to play my cards right now you
can any traction from
that.
Nope
Just the same people
it's my friend
Omar and Jordan
that are most
consistent But that's awful.
I think I think I
got the most reaction from
the initial message saying hey
I'm gonna do this and I think
everything else is just
people don't care to
react.
They've already saw it.
Yeah.
Yeah
How much reaction do you get
from the initial one
the initial post
like seven
people?
Ten I think
if you
count The
extra people that reacted
on Instagram because it's Facebook
and Instagram that I'm posting on
I see.
Yeah, so
yeah Speaking of which we
got a
Whopping zero views
on on YouTube
Yeah, we gotta
Get into it if you could help
me and set that
set up after this
sure.
Yeah.
I mean my Christmas was great
Thanks for asking
You already answer.
Well, I asked you first.
No, well we
We asked the question and Stephen
said that I was doing
my car and so I
know
Yeah, oh, that's right.
I said that you
Okay, oh, yeah,
how's how's your
It was good
actually
so this year my brother
took a
pay cut voluntarily up at
work to
I
Don't know how deep I should get
into it but to save a
business from going under
well
he's a board
member
and
he started it with a
friend and
friends family member
and so
They all took a pay cut
to hopefully
save this save this business
and
That's awesome.
Yeah, so
it's it's a hit for him
financially but
he's dutiful
and like a good steward
of his money, so he's
He's okay.
It's just he doesn't
if he doesn't have to
buy
Gifts for people that would
be ideal
So he requested that for
Christmas and we all agreed
and so it was
really nice because we all got
together We had breakfast
together.
We had lunch together and then
Said our goodbyes
before dinner
It
was
it was mostly
nice because
We didn't have that pressure
of like getting gifts
for each other and
that possible
Disappointment disappointment.
Yeah.
Yeah or like
the not being able to meet
expectations.
Yeah, right.
I think I think that
expectation is
just
because of
Social thing.
I don't I mean,
I think it's marketing.
I yeah, it's marketing
I just
I I
personally have an issue with
gift giving holidays and
the expectation
of them
I don't think there should be an
expectation.
I said, I should give
gifts when you want to yeah, it's
a gift It's throughout the entire
year.
It's not merited.
It's not like oh
You deserve this because of
such and such day.
It's more also I decided to
give this also the idea of like
you're thinking about what gifts
you should give during the holiday on
holiday
season and
or you just
rather Christmas.
And whenever you think of a gift
that you can give to someone, you don't
give it to
them right away.
You wait for like a month or
two.
Yeah.
Right?
Which I think is...
And it's kind of like, it
kind of sucks some of the fun
out.
Yeah.
Maybe it adds a little bit because
of the anticipation.
But I feel like when
I want to give a gift to someone, I
want to give it to them
as soon as I can.
And sometimes gifts are timely.
Yeah.
So, yeah, I don't
really like the Christmas
concepts as
far as gift giving
in the American
culture.
I think the same thing about birthdays,
honestly, because it's like,
I mean, you
absolutely should
celebrate
people
and
them being in your life and them being
important to you.
And
celebrating
that specific day, I think, has
value, but it doesn't have a
gift giving value to me.
It has a,
you are a gift
and we get
to receive you.
We get to remember that we got
you today.
You know what's funny?
My dad, on his
birthday, he started
giving other people gifts.
I've seriously,
honestly thought about doing it.
Because
the
people that show up to
that day, to your birthday,
your celebration of yourself.
are Those some of the best people
in your life.
Yeah.
And that's the gift,
is you getting to spend time with those
people, not them getting to spend
time with you.
Yeah, honestly,
that's powerful.
It really is.
But I think that's,
just the culture puts
that pressure on us.
And it's like, oh,
and then some people,
they really
do.
They're like, oh, you hate me.
Like, you don't care about me.
Like, you blah, blah, blah,
blah.
And it's like,
that is,
that doesn't make
sense.
Not true at all.
Yeah.
And it's like me giving
you a
gift, sometime in
the year when I actually,
when I thought of you,
saw the gift, got
you the gift immediately,
and then gave it to you.
It's like, somehow that's
valueless.
Compared to
this.
When all the companies
say I should give you a gift,
and I don't, like
that's,
so I'm a bad guy because the
companies told you
that I should have given you a
gift.
The idea behind the gift is that you want
to give.
Yeah.
Well, like I said, it's unmerited.
You didn't do anything for this
gift.
You just exist, I care about
you, and I'm giving you a gift.
That's the key though, is the
care.
Yeah.
If you don't care, why would
you give someone a gift?
And then to be fair, there can
obviously be
a
powerful
and gentle loving intent
in doing it on
specific days.
But it's just like,
it's not something
to hold over
people's heads and
set an expectation,
like you have to do this where you don't
love me.
And because people have
that love language
of...
Gift giving.
Gift giving.
Or receiving gifts.
And they
attribute it to a certain
day, but it's like, how about you
just,
is it okay if it's just
whenever?
Yeah.
It should be.
You're still getting a gift.
It probably would be if you
communicated.
Yeah,
yeah.
Communication, I like that.
Buh -boom.
Does that transition into our
segments?
Sure doesn't.
But that does.
Steven, you wanna lead
us into...
Do we wanna pray first?
Oh, hey.
Ooh, I forgot
about that.
Who wants to pray?
I'll take it.
You wanna pray?
Yeah, that's it.
I feel like I should take my headphones
off.
I know, it feels weird.
Take that hat off, dude.
my Take hat off.
It's like, frickin' sacrilege.
So everybody, you're balding.
Steven's like, I'll take his hat
off.
You want me to?
He's a heathen.
No, it's up to you, dude.
I had long hair for like a whole season,
so.
I still have hair.
No, I know, but
they would give me trouble with
that long hair.
It's getting long.
That's why I wear hats too.
So I don't have to comb.
Yeah, honestly.
All right, dear God, thank you for
today.
Thank you for this podcast.
Please help us to
discuss things that are
important, that are
urgent
in our
lives, and the lives
of people that are going to listen
or watch this.
Please help us to speak the
truth,
to press for
the truth, and to not
settle for anything less
than that.
But also not to
confuse anybody,
including ourselves.
Please guide us during this conversation,
and yeah,
amen.
Amen, amen.
I always want to do like a
run -on sentence kind
of prayer.
Yeah.
And then at a certain point, I'm like,
and yeah.
Or then you start doing ums like
me.
Yeah, right.
Anyways,
Stephen, what's the,
do you remember the
topic at hand?
choice.
Oh,
choice,
choice.
So,
uh,
who's going to choose to go first?
open So ended.
Choice and what about choice?
idea Whose was this?
That was your choice.
Well, I'll give the context on it,
considering I'm the one that wrote that
down.
Um,
so we were talking, last
episode we were obviously talking
about the two
trees,
and we were talking about
what
the
tree of
the knowledge of good and evil
represents,
and
just
what happens,
or what the
possibility could be
of when they
ate of the tree,
or the consequences of it.
And it came
to,
at some point we ended up
bringing
up
how
choice or
free will or
whatever you want to
call it, kind of plays a
role in this and
why it's important.
We didn't touch on it because it
is a
huge topic,
but
it does bring
us to
this episode where we
will
do our
best.
Yes, this choice episode
where
we will do our best
to tackle
it.
Um,
but
yeah,
I don't know if one
of you wants
to.
I feel like you started
new crackers.
You want me to crack it open?
Yeah, crack it open.
So I actually did,
I went on chat GPT
and I,
so I've been
writing a book.
I know you guys haven't heard about
it before.
It's called Infinite
Nature, All Creation.
Um,
but
it is a topic that
I'm going to have to tackle myself
in my
book.
And
so
the argument
from
a
30 ,000 foot
view is
really,
does man
choose God,
excuse me, choose salvation?
This is the
bigger topic,
I guess.
Does man choose salvation
or does God
choose who saved?
That's, that's the bigger
question.
That's the big issue on the
table.
Um,
the lesser question
I would say
is,
do we get to choose anything?
Um, do we have
that kind of
agency
where we have
control,
um,
and can
decide
things on our
own or are things
widely just
determined for
us
because
of
any number of things.
So I'll get into later.
Um,
I think what's your take?
Personally,
uh,
the,
the,
the context for my book
has to do
really with the
idea that I was
tackling
determinism
or
reformed
theology tied to
predestination,
um, or
Calvinism, if you will,
and
free
will and
how those two things
clash.
And I did my
research.
I looked at the scripture that they both
referenced.
I looked at scripture that they can both
kind
of look at and
refute.
And I basically
came to the conclusion
that it's a stupid
argument
and
I don't care.
It doesn't matter.
I call it the logistics
of salvation,
which
we are
not,
we
are not the
spiritual,
um,
shippers, if you will,
of this logistical
issue.
We are the recipients
of it.
Um,
and so
I basically
talked it up to
God saved.
God made the decision
to save
and it is through
Christ and is by hearing
the word of God that we are saved
and is
through Christ's blood on the cross that
we can be saved.
Um,
so,
you know, at the end
of the day, it doesn't matter if
God chose or if we
chose because
ultimately God calls us to
make a decision to,
to
choose
Him based off the knowledge
of the gospel, because we have to hear it
and then we have to accept it.
And then it's
God who saves us
though.
Right.
Um,
and that's, that's, I mean, that's,
my perspective on,
on salvation.
Why?
Why?
Yeah.
What, what did you always
think that way?
And then if not, what
changed your mind.
And if you did,
what convinces you?
Yeah.
I mean,
I
would say that I
have always thought
that way,
because
just
my own
perception
of
life
has
been very,
I'll
say, informed
in
that I've
just
seen
that with a
lot of people and with myself
and with a lot of situations,
we don't choose the
situation.
We don't choose the information
around the situation.
We don't choose
really
anything.
We just choose to
try to head in
a direction.
And then
we
just,
that's it.
Whatever happens is
not a result of
us making that decision,
but
a result
of a lot of decisions
being made at the same time
and a lot of
different
factors coming
into play and hitting
all of it at once.
And that's
predestination to
some, because
it sounds like I'm saying that
we don't have
choice.
We don't have a will, we don't
have whatever.
All you're saying though is that
we don't choose the
outcome.
Yeah, we don't choose the outcome.
We choose to be
a part of...
We choose the input,
we don't choose the output.
Yeah.
We can't.
We're not the processor.
Yeah.
Well, but I wouldn't
even go so far as to
say we
don't...
There is a sense of
choosing
the input,
but what is the input
based off of?
It's partly based off
of what we
focus
on, which I think
that's more of
the
best
claim that I've
heard or
thought of
for free will.
We
choose
what to focus on, which is a
mental thing,
and it can be physical if we
can act upon that.
But
even
that is based off of
nature and nurture.
Whatever...
I mean,
we don't choose where
to be born, who to be born to,
born.
how we're Could also do a little
bit genetic, we don't know.
Well,
that's nature,
nature and nurture.
Tush.
Yeah.
So, again, but
we don't choose who we're born
to, what the situation
is, we don't choose where we
live, what school we go
to, we don't
choose...
We really don't make
any of those decisions,
but we have to...
We are subject to them,
and
that
creates
whatever our perception
of life is,
what we choose to focus
on.
I had Chad G
.B .T.
do an assessment of me as a
person based off of my book so
far,
and it basically
laid out, which
I really do believe to be
true,
that based
off of certain circumstances,
my view of life
is
X, Y,
and Z.
I
respond
in a certain way where I have to be
a little more detailed, or why
I think I have to be a little
more detailed.
I think I have to
give
a preface to everything that I'm gonna
say and do, and
whatever, so that people
understand, not for fear
of
failing
at
doing
whatever it is I'm
setting out to do, but
fear of
being
misinterpreted.
Because I want to
make sure that the
true point
comes across,
and that's part of why I'm
finally writing this book, is
because I
feel like I can actually get that
point across.
But I truly
believe
that...
I've truly thought
that my entire life, that I
am
a
product
of
the
situation that I've been
in, of the circumstances
that I've been in,
and I've just had to be a good
steward of that.
And that's where the
focus comes
in,
where
I
can choose...
I just cut someone off
yesterday,
whose focus
has to
do
so
much with the negativity in the
world, the evil,
pointing to a certain people
group and saying that it is
their fault that X,
Y, and Z is happening in the
world,
why we're oppressed by whatever.
And
if
you focus on things
politically, if you focus on
current events, if you
focus on all
these different
things, is all all the
media, whatever.
If you...
go on the internet a lot, if you talk to
people that have
a certain view,
and you're just looking at the
evil in the world, yeah,
that's your perspective.
And I can't say
exactly why
they have this
perspective.
It could be any number of different things
that
led up to this.
But they're
also claiming to be a person of
faith.
And when I call them
to focus on
Christ,
it's like a fight.
They don't want to focus on
Christ.
They want to focus on evil that's being
done and how it needs to be
purged and
blah, blah, blah, blah.
And I'm like, but Christ,
how is the
love of Christ
being shown through you?
I don't care about
what's going on over there.
How is the love of Christ
being shown through you?
Because the only thing that you need to
worry about
is you.
That's it.
Because you
can't change anything that anybody
else thinks, feels, does,
whatever.
And that's why I cut them off.
Because I'm like, I've talked to
you for years.
And you are still
ignoring everything that
I've ever said,
as I'm trying to point you to
Christ, to what Christ has
actually said.
And I
just see danger
in
the things that they're
desiring and thinking
and the
actions that they're taking.
Anyways, that's all to say.
Like I
can
focus on
the negativity in the world and
be subject
to that.
Or I can focus on
Christ.
I can focus on the good
that's in the world
and have peace and
joy and hope
and
take place
and share in that.
And that's why I think
it
points to
the gifts
that God has as
us getting to
share in
those experiences that are available
to us when we are in Christ.
And we get to share in them, but
we have to choose.
And so we have to focus
on it.
We have to accept it.
We have to look at it and say,
this is what God has promised
me.
So I get to take part in this.
I get to take part in
this.
And that's what I see
mostly
as
choice.
We are a product
of our
circumstances.
And
a
lot of people aren't
as self
-aware as I am, I would say,
where
everything
about me
is metacognition.
I'm thinking about thinking,
if you don't know what metacognition
is.
So
I
really question that
point too.
If
you're
not self -aware,
I
think to some degree
that makes it
feel as though
everything's
just kind of chaos.
Whereas I see
everything, I see a structure
to everything that ever happens.
I don't see chaos,
I see evil
manipulating
things and confusing
and searching and
destroying
the
lost.
But I
don't see
true chaos
as though
there is not the hand of
God over it.
You do know that
the human mind
is built to
place
meaning where there
isn't any.
Yeah.
Well, yeah.
Well,
it's...
So you're
saying that you have
metacognition,
thinking about thinking,
and
that you see a
causation
for every
single action or every single
decision that you make,
which is
correct.
That's what I'm hearing you
say, is there?
Yeah.
Okay.
That could be
your brain
coming up with
meaning and
coming up with links and
ties that don't even
exist.
Could it not?
Based off of a biblical
worldview, I wouldn't say
so.
Well, in a biblical worldview,
you're not God.
No, I'm not.
I'm No, not.
I'm not God.
I'm not saying that
I
can see everything, but I
can see based off of
God's word that there
is a reason.
There's certain consequences for
certain actions.
Yeah.
And I mean, it's a
generalization most
of the time.
a It's major generalization because you
see the evil side
in Job, and then you
see
another
side of the same coin
in
Proverbs
where David is saying,
why are you blessing all of these
evil people?
Why are they
thriving?
Yeah.
So it's not always
causal
in nature.
Like things, Good
things good things happen.
to evil people and evil
things happen to good people.
And there's no way that we could
ever tie
the position
together.
In terms of the
full,
like,
grand scheme of things.
But also the
partial
scale too.
Like we don't even know ourselves
very well.
Yeah.
Like you might be
good at
metacognition, but are
you good at like
being aware of your
body?
Are you good at being
aware
of,
I don't know, the
environment that you're in?
Right.
Reading the environment that way?
So that's like reading
people.
I mean more like are you good
at like
organizing
your environment?
Are you good at
like
in
a stressful situation,
controlling
what
you take in and what
you
ignore?
Sort of like, you know, when you're doing
math in third grade and they give you
word problems just to
teach you that skill.
Yeah.
Right?
What to ignore, what to pay attention
to.
In real life that's super
important because if
you get into an
accident on the
road
and
there's several
injuries and
some are more serious than
others, you got to have that
skill.
Yeah.
To be able to
comprehend what to
do.
Right?
So
you could be good at
thinking
and
you could be good at thinking about
thinking.
But are you good at
all of it
and
could it be possible that there's
something else that we're not even
addressing
that
is
an unknown unknown?
I mean,
I don't...
This is
something that I
bring up to people
purely
because I
want them to
understand the
possibility
of where my ego stems
from.
Not so much
so
that I can
explain
it fully
because
either
way I
succumb to
some boundaries which
are
that
I don't know anything
unless I'm told
by
the source.
And I
don't
act upon
what I
think that I know because
I call it assumption.
So it doesn't matter.
So you'd never use an assumption.
I've absolutely used it,
an assumption.
But it's more that
that is what I am
trying to achieve.
Oh, that's the ideal.
That's what I'm trying.
That's how I'm trying to.
No, that's fair because we're all shooting
for an ideal and we never are
perfect.
So...
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, I haven't laid it out
in my book.
It's not useful
to just act upon
information.
You do have to learn how
to use it.
And so even if I
have had whatever we're
going to call this
ability,
my whole life
I've used it horribly
in the past.
I mean, I used it for manipulation.
You're right.
And because I could pick
up on whatever
tiny little detail and
exploit the ever -loving hack out
of it.
Like we do here.
Well, yeah.
But to
affect
someone's life
directly.
The not too good.
But
ultimately,
it doesn't necessarily
matter.
Where
that comes
back to the conversation of
choice,
I've just recognized
that
I made
those decisions
based off of...
It's a
defense
mechanism.
I made that decision based off
of
failures that I
saw around me and
my need to be in
control.
And so
whether or
not it is what
I think it
is,
what other people
may have called it or
whatever, it doesn't matter
because
what
it came from
was me trying to be in
control.
And so, yeah,
was I able to create...
Is this a result of
trauma?
Is this a result of me training
my brain?
Is this a result of
whatever?
I don't know.
Overthinking.
Touch on control.
And I got to hit the restroom real quick,
but I'll set this up and
I'll listen to
it afterwards.
Touch on control because
control is something that
we,
according to your argument, we do
not have.
So what were you actually
searching
for?
If you believed
one thing and you were acting
in another way by searching
for that control.
Does that make sense?
If I believed one
thing...
You believe that God is in
an ultimate control, And and
then...
nothing that we do
is
anything but
predestined.
That's kind of...
Why did you
choose
to
try to
gain control when you,
in your heart, believed
that that's not possible
because God has all control?
No, no.
I don't believe in the
entirety of predestination.
I don't say that.
Explain that nuance.
Okay.
So the idea of control,
ultimately we are stewards
of
the
things...we're
stewards of our situations,
of the resources that we have at our
disposal,
which
is
responsibility.
God gives us responsibility.
He says,
here's the rules,
here's
what
you can do,
and here's the consequences if you don't
do it.
So
the
issue
of choice
is,
in my mind,
not a product
of...I
am in control,
it's a product
of...I
am
focusing on X,
Y, and Z,
and thus am not
choosing the things that God
wants.
So
and that
creates action,
and that
action
is often based
off of a
poor reaction
to
circumstances, to
people,
to whatever
negative
thing.
I mean, it can be...we
can be reacting to a positive thing
and thus be doing something
good, but
we
ultimately do not have
control.
We do not create,
I guess,
is more what I would put
it as.
What I think most
people think of when they think
of free choice or free
will is that they get
to create
the
circumstances, they get to
create
the
opportunities
or
whatever, and I
don't think that's the case at
all.
I think God creates the...I
think God
lays
everything out,
and we are stewards of it, so
we get to focus
on
whatever
direction, and then
He guides our path.
Like it says in the Bible, it says
in the Bible that
man plans
his way, but God directs his
path.
That's not us
making the
decision.
That's us saying, I want
to head in this direction, and God's
saying, well, okay,
that's great,
but this
is where you're actually going to go.
This is what's actually going to
happen, because He sees all the
factors.
He sees everything that's happening,
and so, yeah, we get to focus
on one thing,
but
that is not the control of ourselves in a
sense,
but
that's
only based off of our limited
perception
of life.
Does that make sense?
It does.
It's a lot of information.
I'm trying to go back here.
Yeah.
Let
me
think.
In
a way,
I think I
do
understand
just
in
the fact that
He
is
the creator,
the God, the God of the world,
the God of the world, God
of the world, the
God
of the world,
God
of the world,
God of the world,
the God of
the the world,
God of the world,
the God
of the world, the
God
of the world,
the God God of the world, God of the
world, God of
the world, the God of the world, the God
God of the
world, God of the world, the God of the
world, God of
the world, the God of the world, the
God of the world, the
God
of God of the world, the God of the world,
God God of the world,
God
of the world, the God of the world, God of
the world,
the
God
of the world,
the God of the world,
God
of the world, the
God
of the world, the God him of
the or not choosing
him.
world, God of the world,
So
whether...
And I guess
in
whether
it's
your
whole life as a decision,
I guess
concave
into little
parts into one
whole or
like
one choice
determines
it.
But this is
like
whenever
you die and
I
guess
what I'm going
towards,
you are mainly
going towards
in
life.
I can
try and
correct that since
Daniel's back.
The way that I...
So let's...
Let's create a roadmap,
I guess.
So
I'll
make it...
This is extremely
reductionist,
which I'm really good
at.
So it's
the idea
that
God
created the materials.
Let's say God created this
can, right?
Okay.
And
literally,
I will focus
in on this can,
and then I will go and
I'll
grab it
and do whatever.
But everything that's
happening to this can is
not decided
by me.
I didn't create gravity.
I didn't create
physics.
I didn't create
the can.
I didn't
create
how
everything functions
here.
I didn't even create how my
hand functions.
All that's happening is
that I'm using my body
that God gave me,
focusing in on what
it is that I want to do,
and I'm
doing it.
Now,
I don't know
anything
that could happen
in
between me and going
and grabbing the can,
right?
For all I know, something
could shoot through that
little
peephole right there,
hit me in the chest, and
I never pick up the can.
Someone could barge through there, tackle
me.
You guys could,
I don't know, stop
me, or everything
could shut down.
The lights turn off.
The apocalypse happens.
I don't know.
Any number of things could
happen, and I don't choose
a single one.
All I get to do
is just go and
try and pick up this thing.
It's like the
idea of sitting in
a chair.
I didn't build the
chair.
Yeah, but then that goes
into there
is no choice.
There is only predestined.
No, not necessarily.
It doesn't matter,
is what I'm trying to say.
It doesn't matter if
it is
predestined
or whatever.
It's the fact that
I didn't create
any of this,
any of the circumstances.
The only thing that
I am doing is using the
mind that God gave me
to do a thing
that I think that I can
do.
Then God is making it, and then
God is allowing it
really to happen,
like us making this podcast.
Any number of things could happen
in your guys'
lives, my life,
whatever, to make this just
never happen.
That's
not in
our control
necessarily.
We can
push all those things
out.
Maybe they're important.
Maybe it's family.
Maybe it's girlfriend.
Maybe it's
friendships.
Maybe it's whatever else
work.
I don't know.
We can prioritize this thing,
but there are consequences for that.
We don't get to choose the consequences.
We don't get to choose
any of the
things that could happen in and
around it.
The only thing that we get to choose is
that we
made a decision,
and we get to head in that direction.
We get to see what happens.
We don't get to choose anything
around that.
Like,
yeah, I got to
ask my dad if we could use
this monitor,
but at the end of the day, I didn't get to
choose the monitor
and how it looks,
whatever.
I just got
to use what was there, and
that's
we are
just stewards
of what's in front of us.
I think
a good
idea of
this is how
like a baby
works
with things.
They literally see
something.
They object permanence.
They go and they grab it,
and whatever happens happens,
dude.
There might be some liquid in
there, and I'm screwed.
Mom's going to kill me.
But I just go and I grab
it, and that's
it.
As we As we get older,
it's not as though that is less the
case.
We have more information.
We're more oblivious
to the...
Yeah, we're more oblivious back then,
but that doesn't mean that...
No, no.
Now.
We're more oblivious to the
idea that
we
don't know.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That's fair.
Yeah.
Because it's
that idea that the more you know,
the less you know.
The more you know,
the
more
arrogant you become
thinking that you know
everything
that there is to know.
And it's...
I mean, it's proven in what
you just said as far
as like
any
number of things could happen between
me thinking, I want to grab that
can and putting it to my
lips.
No.
Right.
And none of it you get to choose.
None of it.
But that one time you just did.
Yeah.
For everybody, he just
drinks from his
Dr.
Pepper.
Sponsorship pending.
I did want to touch on a few things.
I'll go backwards.
So we're sort of in the same line of
thinking for
most reason to last.
So I wrote a few notes.
I
think
God
made
us as beings
with free
will.
But God
has by
definition
ultimate
will.
So that lines
up with your argument.
You have the free will to
use everything that God's given you,
your cognition, your arms, whatever.
The Coke can
that he created
other people to create.
To be able to make that
decision and reach out
for it and take a
swig.
God has ultimate will
and what happens in between
and
what happens in the end.
That doesn't
negate the fact that we have free
will.
That just negates
that we have
ultimate will.
Any thoughts?
I think kind of the way that I put
that earlier was that we don't have,
we can't create
in
that we don't create
the circumstances
or create
really
anything
out of nothing.
We just,
we're really just moving
pieces
around.
Yeah.
So we can't create things
out of nothing.
Although
I
was talking about magic last week.
There's a lot of magic in daily
life that we just ignore.
One of which is work.
When we work, we
do create things out of nothing.
We create value out of
nothing.
Otherwise capitalism would
not work.
We'd all be trying to fight for the
same size piece of pie,
so to speak.
But when we work,
we make more pies.
We make a bigger pie
and we all get
a bigger slice at the end of the
day because of that.
And that's the magic of it.
We do create
value out
of nothing.
And value at its core
is
creation.
Well, I mean, we create
value out of time
is really what that ends up being.
Because it is our time.
disagree, I but continue.
Well, because
it's
the
idea that I
work so hard, I put
whatever effort in
and I
use whatever
materials and
whatever,
however long it takes me to do
this and whatever it is that I end up
using,
that
determines
the value.
And I guess in capitalism,
you can kind of decide
based off of your own personal
decision
what you want
the value to be because
you are the creator,
builder, whatever.
So you're thinking, yeah, go for it.
In and
basically
going out two points of
perception,
time and value
in a
way.
Value is perceived
by each person.
Time is perceived as a
value by everyone.
Say it one more time.
Okay.
Ready?
So kind of in the same
knowledge,
one man's trash is in the
man's treasure.
It's valued.
And time is
perceived by
basically everyone.
So you could
be
in one
time zone, but there are
many people in that time zone.
So we're all
experiencing
basically
the exact same
perception
while
value is
perceived like
the pencil.
I don't use it as much,
so it's not as valuable to
me.
You're writing down more notes than I
am, so it's more valuable to
you.
Okay.
So So use utility.
Stimming from need
or creates
need rather.
Yeah, supply and
demand.
What's the point?
I think I missed
the point.
I think he was just trying to define
terms.
Okay.
Yeah.
Was that what you were going for?
Basically, you can't
have value
and time as
they
can correlate together, but
they can't basically
run
in
the same
direction.
So they're two
different things.
So they're two different
things, is your argument.
They're not one and the same,
which is what Michael was saying.
So time is money.
It's false.
In a way.
We trade time for
money, but it's not
necessarily true.
You were going off of value
in something.
He was going off of time.
Okay.
So time is
value
is
not true, is what you're saying.
Time can be
valuable, but
it's not
one to one.
I agree.
So to
your point,
when
you
work, when you put
your time, your skill, your
effort
towards
creating something
that someone ends
up buying,
if they're buying it for entertainment
purposes, that's an
opinion.
That's a personal preference, that
personal value
that they attribute to that
item that they purchase.
But what if you have
B2B, business to business
purchase,
and
you
use
the same materials, same time,
same skill to create
this item?
All things
being equal, the time,
the skill,
and the
pieces
that went into it
costs
50 bucks.
But this person over
here has another business
that can take that
$50 price.
And even with
the markup, say you guys
charge 100,
they can buy it for 100 bucks,
mix it with other skills, time,
and parts,
and
sell it
for a
net profit too.
Where does that profit come from?
At the end of the day?
And where does it come
from?
And where does it end?
Because if your argument is
true,
it
either has to come from
something,
or especially it
has to end somewhere.
But it doesn't.
So they mark it up, is
what you're saying.
But how are they able to mark
it up and actually sell?
Because people value it.
Why do they value it?
Because they can either
create more value
out of it,
or to your point,
it's valuable
to them.
Right.
And in either
case,
why?
Why
are
they able to create more value
out of it?
And why does
the
person value it at all?
In which case?
In both cases,
I'm asking why?
Why could either
of those be the case?
Well, for the B2B,
they value it more
because they can
create more value
for other people.
So even if at the
end of the day our
understanding
of value is personal,
which is true, I agree with
that,
you're
still taking the
finite resources that we
have and making
them
more
efficient
in
creating
value for everybody.
So instead of taking
this
item that you created
that someone would
value at
30 bucks
and you would lose money,
now there's a net loss
of value.
You're giving it
to someone who values it
more because he knows
people that value it more.
And so it's
a
process of finding the people
that value things the most.
And it takes
really convoluted paths.
But that's the
idea behind capitalism.
So the
question...
So
either
way, I
would explain it
as time.
All of that is just
time.
And we could
call it as quality
of time or
like
how the time was spent.
So even
if a
B2B,
somebody is able to turn it over
for
more
profit, they're still
giving it to somebody else
who can value
it more.
And eventually that probably
ends up at somebody,
you know, if it keeps going
B2B,
it will probably
end up at somebody that
values it personally.
But why do they value it
personally?
Because of their time
spent with whatever that
is,
right?
Time isn't
just a
labor
number,
right?
It's not just about how much
time I spent on a thing,
but it's also
the reason
that capitalism works so well
is because we appeal
to
A
time,
right?
In someone's life.
Anytime.
We appeal
to
just
any amount of time that was
spent with
whatever...
Yeah, more time,
anything.
Anything
that...
Because the more
you
touch
something,
the more time you spend on it,
right?
And the more time you spend on it,
the more valuable...
It is to you.
The more money it
can be sold for
technically.
Well, not always.
Depending.
You gotta find someone who's
values it more.
Right.
And the
more value
that
it
becomes
to you,
really.
Emotionally.
Emotionally.
And,
yeah.
So if somebody...
Sentimental, yeah.
So like nowadays...
That's why they have the phrase
sentimental
value.
Yeah.
So like nowadays, you know, there
are
new
versions of
old consoles coming out.
Well, that sells off the
shelves instantly.
Not because
the materials are
cheaper or more or
whatever, but because
people spend
hundreds, if not thousands
of hours on the old
console and now they get to
relive that.
Yeah.
And that value...
Or they think that they
can relive it.
Yeah.
They might not be able to,
but because they believe that
there's a possibility,
they're willing to chance it.
Yeah.
It's more like I get
to...
The nostalgic value.
And that's time.
That's not
time.
That's a good time.
That's a good time.
Nice.
Well, not so.
But,
yeah, it's all based
off of time and
how
we used it, why we
used it.
That's what trauma is all about is
time.
What the time...
What was going on in that
time and how it's
affecting us now, how it's
affecting our time, the quality
of time.
I think your argument
is
sound,
but I think it's
not the argument
focus that I
had.
I think to
help you
understand,
to me it sounds like you're
arguing if
we breathe or not.
And I know that we breathe.
I'm saying,
is it good that we breathe
this
quality of air
or is it good that we
breathe this quality of air?
Right.
So I know that we travel
through time and everything at
the end of the day comes down to time.
But capitalism, the idea
behind it is quality.
Right.
Right.
Just like you said, quality of time.
And so we're trying to increase
the quality of time
for everybody.
And time at that point,
all things being equal, is
not part of the argument.
Does that make sense?
At what time?
At every time, because
there's nothing without time.
Right.
But I think more
speaking too, you said that
we're creating
something out
of nothing or value out of
nothing.
But it's
not out of nothing
because we have to appeal
to time.
The quality of time is mine.
I'm saying that
time
is on both
sides of the equation.
Whether we do something with that
time or we don't, we
spend time.
Right.
Okay.
So you're saying if we
don't reference time,
then it is something
out of nothing?
Yes.
Okay.
I mean,
yeah.
And we don't,
mathematically, we don't need
to reference time.
Yeah.
I mean, it...
If we reference
time because we're
borrowing or paying for
someone else's time, that's
where we bring time
into the equation.
But
that's But...
where another equation
cross sections
with
our equation
of creating value for other
people.
Well, and that's why I say that
my perspective is more
reductionist
because...
All encompassing.
At the end of the day, it is time
and you can't get away from
that and
it is quality of time or
whatever.
So it's trades of time.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I agree.
No, I agree.
And in
a more
not
underlying view, yeah,
absolutely.
So
my
argument was that
we create
something out of nothing.
But the original question
was...
Well, I guess it wasn't a question.
It was more of an assortment
of
or proposal
that God is the
ultimate.
Well, He's being of
ultimate will.
And we're beings of
free will.
How did we get from that
to that?
That's what I'm wondering.
I've lost it.
Whether
God
only creates or
we can
create something.
Oh, right.
Because Michael, you asserted that we
can't create.
So do you agree that we can create
now?
And why did you
assert that in the first
place?
Because...
Well, no, I don't
think that we
can...
Because that's not creating something out
of
nothing.
That's still creating something out of
something
because it's just
moving pieces around
nature.
Well, it's not moving pieces around.
Remember, your argument's
about time.
Time is on both sides of the equation.
If you remember
algebra, if you have X
on both sides, you can
cross them both out.
Depending on where they are.
But we also
agreed that either way,
it
is a result of time.
Either way, it's not possible without
time.
And so that's why it
doesn't
matter from
the
very...
I guess the molecular
structure of it,
whether or
not...
It's fine, but
no matter what, time
is still
there.
But you see what I mean when I say
we are beings of free
will.
We can create things,
but God
has
ultimate will.
So God has time.
And so if he takes that,
then we can't create anything.
But as soon as he gives
that,
we have the free will to
create the rest of the equation.
But it's still just moving
pieces around.
With free will.
And so I think
when it comes to
creating,
I'm talking about
literally...
From nothing.
Literally from nothing.
Okay, I agree with that.
And that's why...
Yeah, we have to
define terms.
Because creating
in God's
terms is literally nothing from
something.
Or at least
something from nothing.
It's something from thought.
And for us, we are
creating...
God is something too.
So you can't say it's
something from nothing, it's
something from God.
That brings up
some
other issue that I don't need
to get into.
It brings up
simulation
theory
of
sorts.
Like where
God's imagination is
what it really comes down to.
Okay,
yeah.
We don't
need to get out of that.
But I think
Daniel is basically
saying
God
is kind of...
He's the first creator,
he can create anything.
He's the master.
And I think
I do kind of agree with
Daniel.
Someone created
this.
They created
it,
but it also goes
back to...
It's my creator.
Yeah, we can create
things through God
in
that aspect.
And
I don't
think you disagree with that.
It's just we had a different
definition of creation.
Moving the OG pieces around.
And creation...
Yeah, it's just very
different from creation
with God.
But yeah,
so...
Well,
not
super
different because God says
that He created this us from the dirt.
From the dirt you
were created,
to the dust you
will be returned, right?
So God uses
His own creation to create
us,
His
ultimate,
the epitome of
His creation,
the one
that was described
as very good.
Right.
And I think in Psalms it even says
that God breathed out
stars.
So there is a sense of,
I mean,
whatever you call it,
I think the one
thing that
we can
actually get into
now is imagination.
Because
that's
the thing
that I
would say
is the
most tied
to whatever
idea
is free will.
Yeah.
Before we go down that route,
can I address a
few notes that I made
before?
Yeah,
So I'll just go in order here
backwards.
I wrote down if choice is,
if the choice is a sin
that we make,
was that
influenced or
controlled by
a good God?
If?
Setting up.
If the choice that we made
was a sin,
was that influenced
or controlled by
God?
And the idea behind
that is God
cannot force someone to do
something evil
because He's devoid of
that.
So who controls that?
Are we being controlled
by the enemy?
All right.
So open question.
The point of that question
is, or that
statement
is more
so pointing
towards the idea that we
have to have free will in some
way,
even if that's the most disgusting
way possible.
The other note that I wrote down
is
it
feels like we are
discounting God's creation
that
when we say
that we don't have
free will,
it's like saying that God
isn't able to
create
something
that is
awesome
enough
to
act on its own
without Him
supervising,
which is our
epitome of creation,
right?
We want an AI
that can think on its own.
We want a robot to do the
dishes on its own.
We don't want to have to be there
and babysit.
And like when we have kids,
like we have to take care of
them
meticulously
to start,
but then the end goal is
they go and take care of themselves
and they end up raising their
children of their own.
And we're there,
but like not
all the time because they take care of
themselves.
And so the ultimate goal is
letting
your creation go.
And who are we to say
God
can't
do that, can't create
us with a
at
least a little bit of free
will.
So that's the note that I have.
And then we were touching on
imagination for the next
part.
That actually
goes perfectly
into the idea
of
imagination
because
that is the
argument, right?
God can do
that.
God could do that.
And I would say that God did
do that.
That being?
That being.
The issue is what
is
control?
Or is the list the finer?
Control is
not
one
creating
something out of nothing.
Control is
taking
whatever is right in
front of me
and
doing
something with it
based off
of the mind that God
gave us, which is
to
create.
I mean, that is a
characteristic
of God.
He is the creator God.
That is a thing that we
get to do because we
are made in His image.
But - Oh,
so God
created from His own character.
Nothing has ever been created from
nothing.
God created
something out
of Himself,
right?
Or created in His image.
Everything that He created was good.
everything Well, based off of His
imagination or
His thoughts
or whatever.
Yeah.
My point is everything that He created was
good.
Where does the word good
come from?
From God.
God.
He gave angels
enough free will to fall.
And we're
a little higher than
the angels, according to the Bible.
I feel like that's enough
to say that we
have at least the
smallest amount of free will.
Enough to fall,
at least.
So that gives to the
argument that I had of like,
if we sin,
is that God?
Is that God controlling
that?
And then also when you said we
create,
like controlling something
is
in a way creating, right?
Isn't that sort of what you said?
Yeah, in the human
way.
We
take from our
own character
and we
create something.
Everything that we create is
from our own experiences.
Everything that we create comes from
our own character, our own interests,
in the same way that God created
something.
So in a way, we
are creating something out of
nothing
because that phrase
does not exist.
God created something out of Himself.
are creating So we
not in terms of materials.
Sure.
And that's generally
what
creation
is.
Well, let's just say
that's given.
That's off the table.
We've already established that God
created everything
OG.
But there's also nothing
under the sun that is
new.
Right.
Idealistically.
So,
well,
but not
technologically.
Like there's
different versions.
With Solomon,
Solomon, in my
opinion,
was describing
there is the idea
that
God created
literally everything
that everything
comes from.
Yeah.
So in that way, nothing under
the sun is new.
Yeah.
In the same way that we draw
inspiration from other
artists, other
inventors, other
technologists,
other companies,
our mom or dad,
like our friends.
Like we draw inspiration from
everybody and everything
around us, including God's
creation.
We draw inspiration from the
Bible
from God's creation, et cetera.
Right.
In that way, we have
no control over what
we create,
but is our
source of inspiration
from
which we,
in addition
to all
that, add our own character
and our own interests
on top of that to
create something out of
that.
Right.
Every good artist
has their
idols that they look
to,
that they are
inspired
by, or maybe they're
like heroes
of
art or of
sports or whatever.
Right.
And they modeled
their lives after that person
or they modeled their art
after that person's
art.
Right.
And so in that way, it's not original,
but also in that way, it's
original because you chose
to model after
that person.
And so that
choice,
that interest that you took in that
one thing out
of
quadrillion
options
is
the new thing.
Yeah.
And that's why
speaking
to the moral
issue of God,
does God cause us to
sin,
and to what
you're talking about creating,
making that decision,
that's where I would say
that
it's freewill
lies
in
what we decide
to focus on.
Because ultimately,
what you just said is, oh,
out of trillions of
options, I chose this one thing.
And yes, I would
say you absolutely
chose that one
thing.
Yeah.
Out of the
things that could have been done in
the garden when it came to sin.
Yeah.
And then you're also saying - I could
focus
on what God
said or I could focus on what the
serpent said and I focused on the
serpent.
Yeah.
And you're also saying that
God gave you the trillion
options and you chose one.
Yeah.
Where he could have gave you this
other set of one trillion
options and
you got to chose something out of that.
So that goes to my argument
of, we have free
will, but God has
ultimate will.
Yeah.
If he wanted to, he could give you one
choice.
Yeah.
Which is what he did with Jesus.
Right.
And he said, God,
is there any other way
to get this done?
And God was like, no, you got to die on
the cross.
No.
Well, and that's why I would
say that
at least my
understanding of what others
think free will
is,
is
not
focusing
on
-
again, this is
probably extremely
reductionist,
but it's
at
least the way that it's been explained to
me.
Free will is that
I
chose.
chose
this,
this is mine.
No, it's the
idea that you ultimately
made the decision.
When
it comes
down to it,
it was me.
Which is not true, that's not what I'm
saying.
Yeah.
And so that's why
I'm being very
careful of how I say it.
I am focusing,
I am choosing, I have
the option, I have
the
free will to
focus on
whatever thing but
everything else around
that I have
nothing.
No control.
No power.
And, you know,
that's the thing that I get
to control is
my focus.
Like I would say
like our eyes or
what we focus our
ears on.
I think the senses are a
very good
indicator
of
what free will
is because I
get to focus, like I can
stand here and I can just
focus on my feet right
now, right?
Or I can just focus on
one point and
that's free will.
That's what I would call free will.
But everything else around
it,
everything else, I mean, but
even then, I
didn't make my eyes.
We don't know the
intricacy of
our eyes, our skin.
God created all
of the senses that we have so
that we could experience
everything around us.
And so I would really
reduce it down to this
focus
because,
and I would even say it because we
didn't even create that word.
So it's really,
really hard.
Like we didn't create our brains to be
able to focus.
We didn't create our personalities.
That's just how we were born.
And so
then
that leads me to the
fact that
this is
part of the logistics.
It just doesn't matter.
We've been delivered to
this earth to experience
things.
And
I
think so that the
teeniest bit of
free will that we have
was and
has to be given
by God.
And in that way, we have no free
will.
Because what does he call
us to?
Well, he calls us to obedience
to him in
subscription.
And what is obedience?
It's not,
I get to do whatever I want.
Whatever you want.
Yeah, no, it's whatever you want within
these
bounds.
Yeah.
And all the bounds are created
by God, by the way.
Right.
And but those bounds are
wonderful.
Like
I'll
probably steal this from someone.
Most definitely.
I just don't know who.
You put children
in a yard with
no fences.
They gather in the center.
You put children in
a yard with fences.
They explore everything.
Yeah.
Because they feel safe.
Yeah.
And it's the same way with us.
Dang, that's good.
Yeah, no, no credit to me
at all.
Holy cow.
If I remember who said
that, I'll say it.
Oh, wow.
Wow.
Right.
So boundaries are a good thing.
God created us with
personality though.
Like the personality that we
were given,
it was given.
And so
we,
it's almost like,
you know, how we're talking about spirit
and soul.
I
don't know, two
episodes ago or something.
It's almost like
the
whatever free will we have
is a gift
that
is not to be taken
back by God
or
controlled by God,
but it is not
ours.
It's a gift
given,
like you said,
when we're talking about Christmas,
like
with
no merit.
Like we did not
deserve this gift,
but God chose to give
us
Michael
with his personality,
Stephen with his personality,
me with my personality.
And he chose to give that
to
everybody
who experiences our
personalities and
to us who lives
with it.
Yeah.
Right.
I think with
my idea of
free will being
focused,
people are definitely going to
hear that and they're going to be like,
oh, so we
have no agency.
We have no autonomy, whatever.
Especially when it comes down to
we didn't even choose our
personality.
Yeah.
And
the
issue with that
is that you live in
the world right now and you exist
and you
are experiencing things the same
way that I am.
And so how,
and so the question is, Michael,
how can you, how are
you reckoning with
existence
the
way that
most people
are where,
oh, I can just get up
from this chair and just leave and
whatever
and
do
whatever and make
whatever decisions and say whatever it
is that I want and
whatever.
How are we
coming
to those conclusions?
And.
And
the
thing is about
it
is
that's why I say it
doesn't matter,
because this is such
an intricate
subject.
I mean,
it's like
the
logistics of
salvation.
It doesn't matter
because I can't wrap
my head around it.
I just can't.
I mean, I
can definitely say
that
I can
hold my perspective about
the whole free will thing,
but it's
not salvific.
It doesn't save me.
What saves me is knowing
that
the Bible does not
matter.
Yeah,
ultimately.
And,
but
it does matter if you
believe in
Calvinism, no.
Right.
Look at him drink his beer.
And it matters.
Well, it matters if you
hold that God can only
be a good God if we have
free will.
And free will
that
I would
think based
off how it's been explained to
me, which is tied
to
I
get to choose.
My choice is
what
makes
this possible.
Yeah.
And, and the
thing that I would just
say
in light of all of this
is that if anything is
focused on you, it's wrong.
You're not the object.
You're the observer.
You are the observer.
You get to
take place in the
world that God has created.
And if he says that
is by hearing the word of
God and believing
on Christ,
then you'll be saved.
That is how it happens.
That is the logistic that we
need to worry about.
It would be really weird if I
got on a ride in
Disneyland and got
off the ride and I was like,
man,
that was the
greatest ride ever because I
rode it.
That would be weird.
That'd be very weird.
And people look at me strange.
We don't say that.
No, we don't.
We say that was a great
ride.
Well, yeah.
Yeah.
These, the people that
created this ride,
like they made something
amazing.
Yeah.
And like, I want to
go again.
You know, like I want to experience that
again.
And us saying
like
that's
man,
I don't know what we say,
but
like
us
saying that we are
in control in
a way is
focusing
on your
experience
so
much
that
you are
saying that.
This ride would be nothing
without me.
Well, if I
didn't show up
for this ride,
this ride would be
nothing.
Like if it's the
idea of if a tree falls in
the forest and no one says it,
does it fall?
Does it make a noise?
Of course it makes a noise.
Of course it makes a noise.
And that's how
I think people view the gospel.
And I could be wrong.
They could not be viewing it this way.
And that's why I think that
this argument
is
an intellectual argument
that
doesn't
need to hold a lot of
weight.
Because
if
you do view
the gospel in light of
yourself
and
not just the
glory of God, and
that we get to take part
in His glory and His
goodness and His kindness and His
love and His joy and the
peace and all the things
that come with that,
then if
you don't view it that way,
then yeah, you're wrong.
I'm going to tell you you're
wrong because everything
in the Bible is for the glory
of God in that sense.
Oh yeah, absolutely.
That's the cornerstone.
And in the same
breath,
because the
first and greatest
commandment is
love the Lord and the
God with all your heart.
And then the second is just
like it, to
love
others
as yourself.
We're not talking about the commandments.
We're talking about Jesus' take on
the Old Testament.
Yeah.
And
if
that is how
we're supposed to be,
in Jesus'
mind,
you cannot have one without
the other.
You are going to
love others and you
are going to love
God if you love others
like this.
I wonder if it's the same for
us
and creation.
It's inseparable in that
we are here to
experience God's creation
and God
wouldn't have created it without
someone to experience it.
That's just conjecture.
But that's a
good point, is
ultimately
it's
for the glory of God.
Yeah.
And how does God get
glory if there's no one to
glorify Him?
And I mean,
even
the rocks
would cry out if we
didn't.
Yeah.
a good That's point.
But,
yeah, we can't view it
in light of, oh,
the gospel is good because
I
get to
receive this.
It's, no, the gospel
is good because
God did
something
incredible
for people that
are not
incredible.
Thus making them righteous.
Infinitely good.
Yeah.
Like God's good deed
towards people who
deserve nothing but
death and
condemnation
makes it
infinitely more good,
which is God's character.
And speaking of God's
character,
let's transition into the K.
Okay.
Well - If we want to talk
about this more, let's talk about this
next time.
Sure.
Yeah.
I do want to double
check and see if Stephen has anything
to say.
For sure, for sure.
We've been
railroading this whole
thing.
No.
No?
Nope.
You guys have mainly covered it.
Good conversation.
I do
really want to
emphasize though that
we
have some
semblance of choice
all day long,
every day,
whatever.
And to be able to
articulate that, I think,
can only be
found in the infinite
and
eternal.
And
I
don't want to make it
seem like I have it all figured
out because that's the whole point of
my book.
Is that
nobody has it
all figured out.
No, never.
And anything
pointing to
having it all figured out is
just human
pride.
Arrogance.
Arrogance.
And so
mostly
what I want to point to
is that it's
all for the glory of God.
And whatever choice we make
should just be the glory
of God,
whatever it is, whether it - is No, it
will
be.
It will be.
And you can be on one side
of that or the other.
You can be on the good side.
Be on right the side of creation.
Yeah.
So,
but yeah,
let's transition.
Well,
to transition, we're going to talk about
the why
behind the trees.
And that really
connects to free will
as well.
those were Why there in the first place?
Yeah, why were they there in the
first place?
Yeah.
And my
take
on this is that
God put those
there
for the
sake of free will,
for the sake of love,
ultimately.
Because does love
have any meaning if
there's no choice
at all?
If God created Adam
and Eve so
lovingly,
and I'm not being sarcastic
here, He created them
like I described
in the last episode, like
with
care and with
detail out of the ground
and
then out of Adam's rib.
And
it
was like this
magnificent
moment when He
united the two of
them.
Because I don't know if you remember,
but Adam was
naming the animals
and he saw that there
was female and male of
each kind,
and he didn't find any
of his.
He didn't find any suitable
companion, yeah.
And so God then put him
to sleep and made him
a suitable mate.
And that was the plan all along.
But imagine
feeling that desire,
feeling that need, that want,
and then God
giving
that to you in like the
most perfect
way.
And
so God created
us
from
love.
Yeah.
And that's clear in that
alone.
But God and
His character is
love.
That's where the idea
of love officially
comes from.
And so
if we
all have this understanding
that love is
chosen,
it's
not a feeling alone.
It's something that you choose.
Like I choose
to love my girlfriend
and
that's
not
just a feeling.
And if it's just a feeling,
that's like yellow
flag.
Like,
are you going to choose to love
this person
is
such a huge question.
And so
in
that God chose
to create
us and to love
us,
that was His choice.
And then He created us to
choose to love
Him back.
And the way that He gave us that choice
was by giving us
the tree
of the knowledge of good and evil.
And giving us a
command saying, don't eat
of this tree.
for
when
you eat of it.
Funny how he said when.
When you eat of it,
you'll die.
That
allows for
ultimate
love.
It allows
for us
to freely love
God.
And I think that God created
that
tree
knowing
that
that was the only way
to quote -unquote
true love.
Knowing that we
would choose the
tree over him.
Knowing that
he would have
to choose
us
over him
and over his own
son.
So being
God, he's omnipotent.
He sees all, he knows all.
He's all powerful.
He saw that coming for
sure.
And so
he
creates the tree.
And I'm not a
mathematician, but I said this
last time.
Two perfect
people
plus
the option to sin
times infinity
equals sin.
It has to do every single time.
That's what it always
balances to.
And you could say,
no, it doesn't.
Like there was a possibility.
But come on.
Like in a society where we believe
that evolution
could be a
possibility
and all it takes
is just more time.
Infinite amount of time
in the garden plus the
option for sin in two
perfect people.
Definitely equal sin.
Every single time.
It has to.
Most temptation.
Just the
availability of sin
is temptation.
And infinite
time would just grow that.
Yeah, it grows the risk
over time.
Like if
two people
in the garden
is
in number
of risk,
right?
Or I guess X
number of risk.
Each day
you roll
dots and it doesn't
matter how small the
risk is.
If there is a risk
and there is a risk because
the trees are there
and the people are
there and they have
access to the trees
or to the tree
rather.
That enables the
risk.
So there is a risk,
however small.
And then you add an infinite
amount of time that
has to equal the
risk occurring.
Has to.
And so when God did
that,
He was enabling perfect
love.
Perfect, reciprocal love.
But at the same
time
knew
how it was going to
end.
God's no fool.
He's dealt
with this before with
Lucifer.
Think about the
same
math
equation, if you will.
If two perfect people
plus
sin
times
infinity
equals
sin,
then
two
imperfect people
plus
an
infinite God.
And infinite
love
will
equal a
sense
of,
I've got this,
it
compounds,
I
guess,
the love,
the feeling of love, the
joy,
the whatever.
Because I mean, we
look back 2 ,000
years at the death
of Christ
and
I mean, it can still
make us emotional.
We can read that entire
description
and
we can look back and we
can think to ourselves,
wow.
And we can see the ripple
effects of that and think,
wow.
And we can look at the apostles,
I mean, just at the apostles
and we can be like,
wow.
And
it
compounds
because there's more and
more effect
and that's,
everybody points to,
oh, well, God is
evil, I guess,
for allowing
the
possibility of sin.
It's like,
yeah, but we as
believers get to
look
at
at the fact that we
failed, fail.
we went against God,
and His love is
compounding
every
single
moment after.
And it will eventually
end in us
spending
glory
with Him.
And that
is also a
very weird concept.
It's very similar to forgiveness
because - I've never thought about
the compounding effect of God's
love.
We're negating
evil
with
this thing that is
just so - I mean,
by taking on
more
burden,
more pain, whatever,
and saying that
that is
a mercy,
that is a love, because the
alarm bells too
evil,
tying it back into our conversation
about
pain and all that
different stuff.
There's,
and I just said so many
things that I can even fully
comprehend that I just
said,
but
that
is the
case.
I mean,
in a relationship,
I've been in enough relationships
to know when
somebody wrongs
you,
and then
they
do
better on that, and
you stick with
them,
they may even bring
it up over and over
again.
I cannot believe
that you forgave me for
them.
I cannot believe
that you are
still with me.
It's just complete
and utter disbelief.
Me being
imperfect,
that's crazy.
But with God, it's like,
I cannot believe that
this is still
happening.
Because the end of the story should
have been, we
sinned death,
instant destruction.
Let's re -kick thing.
this turned We them all off.
Yeah,
restart.
But that's not the case.
He stuck it out.
I think the reason for
that
is
because of love.
Because God's character is
love,
I just switched cameras on
accident.
There we go.
Because God's character
is love,
and he's also
omnipotent,
which
is all -powerful,
but also all
-knowing.
Knowing that
in
order to enact his
character fully in love
with
results in
the fall of man,
he also knew that
creating man would mean
costing
his son,
because he
also knew his perfect
sense of
justice.
He also knew
the
cost
of sin,
and it's infinite
offense to him.
And you seem
like you have something.
Oh man.
Yeah, go for it.
I'm just dying.
So the
thing is that we attribute as humans
to the greatest
forms
of
love.
What are they?
When you don't deserve it, when
you deserve it the least.
Think about media.
Think about movies, books,
whatever,
things that someone would
say to someone they love.
This is the
peak.
This is the most that I could
ever give, and this
is it.
This is my love.
Can't live without you.
Okay.
That's right.
Stephen, do you have any ideas?
It's like I can think of the
concept, I guess,
but I'm trying to figure
out what
it's
called.
But go on.
I will give you the world,
and I would
give you my
life.
What are the two things
that God did for us?
He gave us the
entire
world.
He gave us everything.
And he also gave us
his life
on the
cross.
Those are the two things.
Those are the pinnacle
of
human
love,
and God did
it
without
asking
us.
And crap, what was the
thing that you were just saying?
There's something else.
Yeah,
God did this knowing the
cost.
Yes.
He knew
that we would
do whatever,
even though he gave us the world.
He knew that we were going to sin.
Yeah, and idiot can see
that.
Me being the idiot.
Yeah,
and
doing
a,
what's that
analysis?
It's called a specific
analysis, but the pros
and cons
of
whatever,
he decided
that
instead of
leaving us
to our devices, which I
brought this up last time too,
instead of leaving us to our
devices,
leaving us completely
alone, because
quite honestly,
if he were to have left us
completely alone,
think of what the
Tower of Babel would have
been.
We would have
gone so
far into
the perversion.
If we did not
get the curses,
the Tower of Babel probably
would have come sooner.
I mean, we would
call ourselves God.
And if God didn't intervene, if
God didn't destroy
us and
allow one
family
to survive,
that was faithful.
I think
that's
widely accepted.
Oh yeah, there's all these people
that are
evil and
awful and blah, blah, blah.
It's like, yeah,
okay, I guess it makes sense to
kill them off, because they
weren't going to turn to Christ.
They weren't going to turn to God, and
God just destroys them.
But the mercy
was
allowing this other
family,
who also wasn't
perfect,
by the way,
to continue
on, to be
on the Ark.
But
we're looking
at the
idea
that God would allow sin
at all, or
would allow
this option,
it's like,
because of
choice.
Chat GPT, I
had
this,
I had to pull this up.
Why did you pull that up?
Well, no, that's right, yeah.
Okay.
You were talking about
a
lot
of things,
but you said something
that made me think about
this,
in regards to choice.
This is how it's written out.
No choice
leads
to no experience.
No experience
leads to
no growth, and no
growth leads to no
becoming.
So the
first part really hit
me.
No choice
leads to no
experience.
What I would attribute
that to is
get rid of
all our senses,
which means we can
experience
nothing.
We cannot
experience.
If we cannot
experience,
then that's it.
Yeah, you think about
the
person that
didn't have any sight or
hearing, they could only feel,
right?
They could taste, they could smell.
But how do you communicate with that
person?
So it's almost
like
in
that
train of
thought, that
choice
is
so heavily
tied
to
our experience.
So bear with me.
Maybe,
maybe
free
will,
free choice
is
actually
truly
the
freedom to
experience.
Yeah.
That lines up
with
Solomon's
take in Ecclesiastes 2,
where he says nothing
really matters at the end of the
day,
except for
enjoying what
God has created.
Ultimately,
I think I created the world for more than
that, but with the
curse came
the
pointlessness of work.
Right.
I just thought that
was really crazy.
Yeah, that's astounding.
Because then it goes
into
choice
versus will,
and it says will is capacity
and choice is direction.
And so I guess
in a sense,
I'm visualizing as
like choice choice is like a
compass.
and will is
like...
Ability.
Well, the space.
Like, yeah, like physical
ability, like I can
go...
Within the bounds.
And do the things,
like the bounds is
probably the entire
universe, or I
mean, depending on your situation,
whatever.
Which you did not choose.
Which we did not choose.
Rather than,
oh, and it even says here, will is the
engine and choice is the
steering.
So it's like,
and nothing in that
really says,
I'm creating anything,
I am determining
anything.
It says,
I just, I am just subject to...
You're on the road.
Yeah, I'm on the road.
I'm in the car, I'm driving.
But you didn't create the road or the car.
Yeah.
And people were riding along with
me.
You've got the gas.
Yeah.
You've got the steering wheel.
You've got the hands to move the steering
wheel.
But all of those things were given
to you as well.
So in that way that
everything was given to
us,
we don't have free will.
Just like when you see a kid
in a Porsche,
and you're like, your daddy gave you
that Porsche.
Like, don't smirk at
me.
Screw off.
In the same way,
Satan says to us, your
daddy gave you that
free will.
Use it the way that I want
you to use it.
That's interesting.
That's a crazy
perspective.
But we still have free
will.
Cause God gave it to us.
Cause I still eat the
fruit.
Yeah, let's exercise it to
obey God's will.
And God
tests
us.
That's another thing.
It's another,
yeah, it's the
expression of, do
you love me?
Do you love me?
That Jesus hired you.
Peter, do you love me?
Michael, do you love God?
Do you love him?
And it's like,
Peter had a choice in that
moment.
He could say, oh yeah, I love
you.
And then, you know,
go and not.
Yeah, which he did.
Which he did.
We all do.
Yeah,
but at the
same time, he still died for
Christ.
Yeah.
And he still proved that he loved
him.
Maybe that works as dead.
Yeah, but also
we
are dead without
Christ.
And it
doesn't matter.
Going off the rails here, hold
on.
My thought.
Love going off the rails.
Oh, you mean like mentally,
you can't.
You need to get that going.
Yeah, I know.
You do too.
Gosh damn.
I was just gonna say like.
Go for it.
We,
this argument, I'm so
sorry.
Like the argument
of
free
will and
predestination, like it
bothers me.
Because it's like,
when the Bible
says
faith without works is
dead.
What can the dead
do?
Nothing.
Absolutely nothing.
But it's talking about the faith.
But it's talking about faith and
what is dead faith.
It's nothing.
It does it,
I mean,
but the thing is, that it
exists.
It's there.
It affects
things.
It's negative.
It's whatever it is.
It's happening.
But when you compare
everything to God
and that he
is the substance,
it's nothing.
And it doesn't matter.
So why are we having
this debate
matter?
Why does it matter that
they made the
decision or
that they had choice
to eat of the
fruit.
Love.
Because of love.
But also like,
we're focused so much
on the fact
that, oh, they had the
choice, which means that
love.
I like the
idea that choice
is the
opportunity for experience,
not I created
the
opportunities
in front of me and
I
made that
decision
based off of
my own will and
power.
Yeah, my ultimate power.
Like God gave me the opportunity
to experience this
and
he
determined the
circumstances.
Yeah.
Or the circumstances,
the consequences, the whole thing.
I really like that explanation.
Anyways, I'm sorry.
That was creepy.
I could
keep going
on this for forever.
Yeah, no, it sounds like you're excited
about the idea.
And the idea is,
like that's a really good
framing
that I've
probably not heard
before.
Cause the way that
I've thought of it
before is
in the perspective
of...
love,
of God's love, and not
in
the frame of our
own
ability
to experience.
Right?
And so,
let
me
finish, if I can,
the thought that I have,
because it goes full circle.
So, because God's
all -powerful, all
-knowing,
He knew that He had
to
give
us the free will
to
disobey Him
in
order for it to be real
love.
But He also knew that equation
would end in sin,
which means He would have
to give His Son
to
satisfy His
justice,
to
make
things right, make
things good, and make things
balanced again.
And He had to do it in a
way that's
accentuated His
character ultimately.
So, that includes justice,
that includes love, that includes good,
that includes everything
good about Him.
That includes
His mercy, His grace,
all of His characters.
I wish I could know all of them all
off the top of my head.
It's probably infinite,
honestly.
Honestly, yeah.
Like I said last time, scratching the
surface,
barely after
infinite time.
The only way
that
we
could become
permanently
safe,
permanently
in
relationship
with God,
permanently in His
arms in relationship
with Him,
was through this
method.
And so,
God did it this way,
giving us choice,
therefore,
the ability to fully
love Him,
knowing that we wouldn't,
knowing that He would.
And He would, through His
Son,
through the sacrifice of His own
Son,
through the sacrifice of Himself
on the cross,
for our sins to
justify His
need for justice.
And
in doing so,
taking the choice away
from us,
and choosing to
die on the cross,
He makes us so we no
longer have the choice
to
not
choose Him anymore.
Hmm.
And that's the only way that we can be
safe.
And that's the only way that
true
love can be fully expressed,
is through choice.
What you're bringing up brings
up a good point.
There are rules
that we don't
actually understand.
Oh, yeah.
There's a
cosmic rule,
if you will,
law,
however you want to put
it,
that
basically makes it to
where,
like,
God functions under
these things, and He does not
reveal all
that He knows,
all that He thinks, all that He,
He doesn't reveal all these things to
us.
He doesn't reveal this law.
He doesn't reveal these
rules,
because
they're not necessary for
salvation.
Yeah.
But
it's clear
that it
exists.
It is something that
He functions off
of.
And we
are also subject
to it.
And I think it's important
that,
I mean, in the many
things, in God's
infinite nature, in
God's
mystery,
it's just another
thing that we have
to
accept.
Really, yeah, accept, that He's
asking us to accept.
That's why it's called faith.
He's not giving us all the information,
because if He gave us all the information,
we would be dead.
It's the equivalent,
probably, of just being
present.
Yeah, we'd be overloaded.
And it would be too
much.
I mean, it's even overloading just
us thinking about these
things right now.
And we can't even
articulate
it.
The fact that this has taken
two hours
is
perfect enough.
Yeah.
And we've
probably...
No, we definitely have only
scratched this.
I feel like we
haven't even scratched surface.
Yeah, there's no scratching.
Yeah,
we've
been lightly
blown
on the surface.
Yeah, Like, oh, this is a
nice
surface.
I'm trying to scratch into it, but
it's impenetrable.
It really is, because God is
so vast.
Yeah.
And me
saying
all of this is speculation.
Yeah.
100%.
There's nothing in the Bible that says
that.
There's nothing.
There's nothing in the Bible that says
that what he did
was
to ultimately
fulfill
perfect love.
But to me, that's always
made sense.
A friend asked me that.
Why was that a possibility
in the garden?
And this is the answer that I came up
with at the time.
And it
clicked,
and it made a lot of sense to me
at the time.
And I haven't heard an argument
that makes more sense than that.
It's like, God's perfect
love had to be expressed, and
we had a choice.
And in that choice, he
knew that we would sin.
And in that sin, he knew that he would
need to sacrifice
and die
in order to satisfy
his own justice, in
order that we could
be
just
fully
saved
from ourselves
and from our sins,
so that we
could choose
Christ.
And at the
same time, Christ
choose us
so that
we had that
ultimate
fulfillment
of perfect
love,
where there was a choice on both
sides,
God being the ultimate chooser
and us being the little
chooser,
and as much as he gives
us the ability to choose.
Well.
And
that
follows scripture
where it says, God chose
us from the beginning of time.
Oh,
it says that?
But he also gave
us the ability to choose him.
And so it's not that we
don't choose, it's that God chose
us first.
We chose him second.
Then that's nothing to brag
about, but we did
choose.
And true love,
in my opinion, needs
a choice.
Well.
And it's not manipulation
either,
because it's perfect love.
And I've heard this
phrase recently of,
it's not manipulation
if it's good for the other person,
it's influence.
And people go like,
ah, yeah, that's what it
is, right?
Because we all want to justify our
own sinful
manipulations.
But in a way,
that's true.
Like if it's good for the other
person, it's not
manipulation in an evil
way.
And so in the same way that God
is the ultimate
chooser of those whom he
saves,
it's not
manipulation.
Well, it's like indoctrination.
There's a huge
misunderstanding with the word
indoctrination.
Indoctrination is literally just
teaching.
Literally.
That is like, actually what it means,
you're just teaching people
something.
But the
connotation of indoctrination
is, oh,
yeah, brainwashing.
It's like, okay, but propaganda.
But that's because of the people
that have done that
in a manipulative
way.
It's based off
of bad experience.
Because they were teaching something that
was
wrong.
They ended up
either serving
the person who was teaching,
or
not
serving, doesn't matter.
But in the end,
hurting the person who was being
taught.
Because they were being taught
something that was wrong.
So indoctrination is
only
manipulative
and
propaganda and
brainwashing.
If it's wrong,
would you send a child
to school to
learn two times two equals
four and all that?
And brainwashing.
Who says,
under whose authority?
Well, it's
technically brainwashing.
Because that child didn't know
it before.
That child
would probably
have not come to that conclusion
on their own.
That's the definition of
brainwashing.
Why is it not brainwashing?
Because it's the truth.
And so indoctrination of
the word
in the way that God
wrote it
and intended it for
its original audience
is not
indoctrination to your part.
But I think we should end
there.
What do you think?
One more point.
Because you were talking about,
wow,
we're making a good time.
Right?
We're actually coming to a good
close.
We can change.
We can.
Well, I don't know if this has changed.
the The
idea of...
love,
and it is,
it's
a powerful
idea
in
the Bible,
but it's the
union,
excuse me, the contract
between two people.
And
the
Bible talks about
it
in
light of Christ and
His church,
right?
And His bride is
the way that it describes it.
But in
Genesis,
it lays out for this
reason,
a man is to leave
his mother and
father
and
to,
I can't remember what Bible the says.
And Bible the talks about marriage as a
contract.
It doesn't talk about it as this
lovey -dovey,
emotional...
Well, not even a contract.
Well, it's
a covenant,
but it is.
What is a
covenant?
Well,
it's a
pact.
It's a
covenant
covers.
Covenant covers in
the fact that
if
you do something that
goes against
the original
idea behind
the covenant, it's covered.
So that's the
idea of marriage is
I
cover
you
in
this promise
that I'm going
to be with you, I'm going
to spend the rest of my life
with you
no matter
what
and
treat you this way.
I promise, no
matter what you do,
say,
don't do, don't
say to
me
or to anybody
else.
And then now the person
covers me with
that same promise.
And so it's two
promises
covering
two people.
And it's not
like, if you break
your promise,
my promise is broken too.
No, it's if you break your
promise,
I mean, that sucks.
That really does.
But it's totally not
even...
It's not associated with the promise
that I gave to you.
Yeah.
It's not dependent.
It's not dependent
where
a contract is.
And it's a picture of Christ
in the Church.
Stronger than a contract.
It's infinitely stronger.
Yeah,
because it's
still
in a sense because it's
an agreement between
two people.
Well, you...
So A mystery three.
But it's a...
Basically, can two people
walk together unless they
agree to?
Right.
Yeah.
So there is an agreement
there that
you both make this covenant
toward each other.
You can't just go up to a
random person and make a covenant over
them.
I guess you could if you want to do, but
that's weird.
But I mean, I guess that's what Christ
did.
But...
So two people decide
to make a covenant with each other.
But that covenant is not one covenant,
it's two covenants.
And then it's a model
of the covenant that
Christ made with the
Church.
Yeah.
And that we are to make
with Christ.
But Christ being
God
knows that we are
unable to keep.
And us being
bonded
in marriage know that
neither of us are able to
keep.
And that we are going
to fail.
But this is our
best attempt at remembering
what Christ has done for
us
and for the Church as
a whole.
And living that out.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And
I
was going to say that that
idea,
there's a
choice that's being
made in that.
There's a decision.
And
the
way that I
kind of explain, determine,
is completely
terminate.
And ultimately, for us as humans, we
don't know
God
completely.
So based on our
limited knowledge, we have
to decide which is
based on faith.
And it's especially based
on, or
it's definitely based on
faith with
another
human.
Because the person
is going to change, we don't know how
they're going
to change.
And so
this
idea that God is
willing
to
go to
allow
offense, allow more
offense,
allow ultimate
vulnerability.
Yeah.
And
to
the point of dying on the cross,
I mean, it's the forgiveness
thing.
He was offended, or he
was,
yeah,
there was an offense against him,
and then he took it again.
And he took it, I mean,
in a sense, even greater
than the
first one.
What prosecutor would ever
show up to the
court and say, you know what,
this guy murdered someone,
but I'll take his punishment.
That's crazy.
Nobody would do that.
Yeah.
No prosecutor would ever
do that.
But God was like, hey,
you offended me.
You, I mean,
yeah, you didn't.
And then the judge is like, good idea.
You know what?
I'm going to die.
Yeah.
And
again,
he took the penalty,
but he's like, if you don't
accept that, if you don't
choose that, if you don't want
to experience all that
can be shared in that,
then you're
choosing the other side.
And that's where choice
definitely
exists.
By choosing the other side, you mean
not choosing Christ?
Yeah, by not choosing Christ.
You're choosing destruction.
You're choosing to
skip.
To skip court.
Yeah.
Go to hell.
Pretty much.
Yeah.
Crazy.
That's heavy.
Okay.
One more thing before we end.
What are we going to talk about next week?
Because I have no idea.
Usually there's like a progression
and - I feel like we could
touch on this topic again.
We can touch on this again.
So let's think about it throughout the
week.
I'll monitor, see if anybody
makes any comments.
I doubt it at this point,
because we're not pushing this podcast
yet.
Yeah.
We do have one
viewer.
Yeah,
talk to other people, talk to our mentors,
parents,
etc.
And see
if there's anything else we could touch
on this point, because it is a huge,
huge topic.
So the next episode will
be choice part
two.
I like it.
Because there really is a lot.
Yeah, there is a lot.
And if we
come to
find that there's not,
I
feel like we are probably
missing something.
But we can move on.
Yeah.
Sure.
Okay.
That sounds good.
Then I will
lead
us out.
Wow.
I'm impressed.
Yeah.
I'm really impressed.
Look at that.
Almost two and a half hours.
This is the end of
the episode
five
of
- That deserves a celebration.
The Perfume DK Podcast.
Give me some.
Hey -o.
Hi, Pat.
Yeah.
You guys did most five
episodes.
We mostly do most of them.
You're not in a talkative mood today, huh?
Dude, last episode.
You were talking.
I think you tired yourself out.
You
talked
a lot during that.
He's got talk enough for
every
five episodes, apparently.
Maybe four.
Dude, I mean,
anything that you have to say, I
really love to hear.
And - Whenever you have something to
say, - a have I If you nothing to say, I
have
a feeling like it's
just
because
it's all being covered.
You're waiting for the one thing that
us idiots don't actually see.
That's -
Who's the actual smartest person in
the room?
Honestly, dude,
I think it is Steven.
Isn't that what the Bible says?
What?
Even a fool can appear wise if
they stay silent?
Yeah.
Not to say you're a fool.
That's what you definitely are, sir.
No, no, I said even
if.
Even a fool.
There's a good possibility.
Yeah, for all of
us, yeah.
But no, we
- Wow.
Five episodes.
Technically six episodes because of
episode zero.
Right.
And 2 .5?
And two - seven episodes.
Wow.
Dang.
Wow.
That's crazy, dude.
We're pretty close to our goal here.
But we thank you
if you're listening
to this.
For joining this discussion
and we hope,
honestly,
that it is edified.
Infinitely edified by this
podcast.
It's crazy
the ways
that I've been influenced
by it.
Yeah, I'm saying.
And entertained.
Listening back is so
fun.
Because one,
I see all the places
where, especially when it's late,
it's like,
that didn't make any sense.
And we kept
going.
Yeah.
But - It happens.
Even aside from
that, we're having
a good time.
We're not taking ourselves
so seriously because,
at the end of the day, And at at
this table, we agree that -
salvation is the Christ and
that's the most important thing
and everything else
that we speculate on
is
there
for us,
given to us by God, to
speculate on
and to
enjoy.
We're choosing to enjoy
it in the way that we are,
enjoy it honestly.
And if there are more
topics that we miss
or...
That you're interested in.
If there's passages
that
you'd like us to go through
in the perfumed
portion.
The last few episodes, I think we've just
been
going over for concepts.
We'll probably start back
up on
going
through scripture in the next
episode.
We'll see.
But when we get it up
and running, please message us
on whatever
platforms,
Spotify, YouTube.
Wherever else.
iTunes,
iTunes, podcasts, whatever.
And leave us a review,
constructive, hopefully,
criticisms, comments.
Or just bang your head on the keyboard.
Yeah, all the
things.
Just want that good
algo juice.
I know, yeah.
What did you say?
Algo juice?
Algo.
Algorithm.
Yeah, we're feeding the
algorithm.
Okay, yeah.
There we go.
Beautiful.
I stole that one.
I can't take credit.
Algo juice.
Anyways,
we hope you will join us
next episode.
And these episodes
will actually
probably start airing
in the next few months.
Next year,
2026.
Yeah, good old 2026.
Wow.
I really feel like
we've come a long ways.
And I'm really excited for the future.
Yeah, me too.
Before we go, what's
that animal on your hat?
It is a kiwi.
Can you show that to the camera?
Sure.
This was given
to me by some
friends.
They...
Oh, it's ignoring
you.
It's trying to find you.
You can kind of see it.
Yeah.
Okay.
It was given to me by some friends.
They gave me that and they gave me
a sweater with a kiwi
with sunglasses
on it.
And they're like, these are the
most Michael thing we've ever
seen.
That's fair.
That's awesome.
That's your spirit animal?
I don't get it.
I don't understand.
I get it.
I don't know anything about it.
I get it.
Michael the bird.
The bird.
Yeah.
Steven, you get that?
You think that's his spirit
animal?
They have the strangest
sound.
Apparently it's a weird bird.
It's fair.
That's all I know.
Apparently it's a weird bird.
The other thing is, is
that the
females,
whenever they have the eggs,
it tastes like 80 to 90
% of their body.
So their organs are shifted.
Holy cow.
Here's the thing.
We were saying how
Steven is the most
intelligent person at this table.
The more things that you
spout out, like
you're
just off the top of
your head.
It's like, okay.
You know, he's going to college for
mechanical engineering.
What?
Yeah.
Right now.
Right now.
You're going to college for mechanical
engineering right now?
Yeah.
He says it like it's nothing.
No.
He never said
it.
You said it and he just
agreed.
That's crazy.
Okay.
Anyways.
Yeah.
They said, I'm willing to
make it part of my personality.
So if you see more kiwi gear, if you
want to send me kiwi
gear, eventually we
might have a PO box.
But that would be sick.
Anyways, we should probably end this
episode.
Yeah, we should.
Who wants to pray out?
I can pray us out.
Cool.
Yeah.
Quit.
Cool.
Thank you for joining us
for this episode
of Perfume Decay.
Okay.
Lord, I thank you for this
opportunity that you've given
to us
to
gather in your
name
over the internet,
over a podcast,
and
to
get the opportunity
to dwell
on your word,
to perfume our experience
with it,
and to take
joy in it.
We get to share in
that opportunity that you give
to us freely
being
followers
of your son.
And I pray that we do not take
that for granted.
I pray that we do not
take this opportunity
to make this podcast
for granted.
You've given us
this opportunity.
And I pray that we are
good stewards of it.
I pray that
even
if this goes nowhere
else but
within this
room,
I pray that we are edified and that
we ultimately
continue to
glorify you, continue
to grow closer to
you, to be
more like your son,
Jesus Christ, because
that is ultimately
ultimately...
what you've called
us to.
And I pray that we
go out the
rest of this week and
think about the things that
we've talked about.
I mean, the opportunity of
choice,
the
value that
that does provide
us, and how it points
to your love, how it points
to your goodness and your
grace and your mercy,
these are things that we should be
thinking about all
day long as they are
prevalent
in your word.
And I pray that as
we continue to make this podcast
that those
themes
stick in our
minds.
And I pray this all in your name.
Amen.
Amen.
Good stuff.
See you all next time.
Next time.
Deuces.
How do I turn this off again?
Listen to Perfume(D)ecay using one of many popular podcasting apps or directories.